What I don't understand is people saying that "since you're not going into the engine just get an E.H.S controller". The price difference between the two is minimal, so why not get the better controller? Yo never know what you're going to do a year or two down the road. Money spent well now is money you won't need to spend later.
Im just curious define "better" i dont think most people realize what each controller is actually capable of.
If someone buys a controller that is capable of more but never spends the time or $$ to utilize it does it work better?
If you use a pc3 with a prebuilt map that someone else designed does it work the same on every machine?
What are the limitations for each controller?
How does each controller actually work?
Have you used autotune and then actually compared the compiled map against a actual tuned map?
Have you tried the difference between a generic pc3 map and any other form of controller?
Im just curious and my questions are open for response they are not meant to be cynical in anyway im just more so curious what the general perceptions of peoples are between the 2 styles. i think a lot of mis/bad information gets circulted and also the controller we make gets lumpped into the mix of all the others that look like it because the look alike.